<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>dotedu &#187; reflections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://szanne.edublogs.org/category/reflections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://szanne.edublogs.org</link>
	<description>blogging about .edu stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 02:07:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Meaning well &#8211; Designing well</title>
		<link>http://szanne.edublogs.org/2007/08/26/meaning-well-designing-well/</link>
		<comments>http://szanne.edublogs.org/2007/08/26/meaning-well-designing-well/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 17:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>szanne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Teaching with Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reflections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second life]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://szanne.edublogs.org/2007/08/26/meaning-well-designing-well/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just reviewing Hooks&#8217; Teaching to Transgress and Palmer&#8217;s The Courage to Teach, both of which focus on the humanity of teaching. I think most of us involved with technology and teaching get the importance of &#8220;keeping the humanity&#8221; alive. I&#8217;m concerned that the folks who are a bit skeptical about technology, or a design approach [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just reviewing Hooks&#8217; Teaching to Transgress and Palmer&#8217;s The Courage to Teach, both of which focus on the humanity of teaching. I think most of us involved with technology and teaching get the importance of &#8220;keeping the humanity&#8221; alive. I&#8217;m concerned that the folks who are a bit skeptical about technology, or a design approach to teaching and learning will do more harm than good when they get their hands on new tools. I&#8217;m seeing in the Second Life educational community a lot of projects and approaches which mean well, but really aren&#8217;t effective because of a lack of understanding about the technology, the context, how people learn and how to design learning. These are more important than in a Hooks&#8217; kind of classroom because when things don&#8217;t go right, the humanity can only go so far at appeasing the frustration, boredom, confusion, etc.<br />
Only the most highly motivated learners will slog on through. DE (distance ed) is a case in point. Lot&#8217;s of miserably designed DE programs have given the approach a bad rap. The unfortunate thing in the case of DE, is that it can be a viable option for many learners, not just those who&#8217;ll slog through poor designs. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://szanne.edublogs.org/2007/08/26/meaning-well-designing-well/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
